This has only been a major problem for the last couple of days; before that it happened a couple times a day rather than every few minutes. Meant to include just the link, not the gomix.
The project name is crimson-avenue. Saw another reset since your message; made the project public. The changes I had made in neutral. It seems that, when there is a momentary connection glitch, the choice is being made to throw out work since the last autosave. It is technically possible other sites do it not to throw out the work, but to simply retry and resume saving once the connection is re-established.
This is unfortunate may I ask you some additional questions?
Microsoft Edge Hmm We Can't Reach This Page
We deploy few times a day , depending on the day… , and during the deploy the editor disconnects briefly. On the other hand, if it happens more often, we will look into it immediately! We understand that it is very desiderable, and we are figuring out ways of implementing it in a stable way. How much time of work you see reset when a disconnection happen? I see the issue every few minutes. I generally lose between 5s - 1min of code, plus it resets to the top of the file. I have seen a few cases of larger losses.
Last time I was running ping gomix.
Three basic problems of HMMs
I saw the issue as usual, and my ping times ranged from Recurring "Hmm.. We're having trouble connecting. Try refreshing? Hey, Really cool so far. Gareth August 31, , pm 2. Having this problem constantly at the moment.
- YouTube Is Built to Keep Getting Worse – Hmm Daily;
- Benes & Masaryk: Czechoslovakia (Makers of the Modern World).
- Tempting the Highlander.
- Bred By The Horny Incubus (A Demon Breeding Paranormal Erotica).
- But Microsoft Edge Isn't Worth It.
It is becoming unusable as I keep loosing changes. Any timescales for a resolution?
Hidden Markov Model and Naive Bayes relationship
Gareth September 22, , pm 6. JonthueM October 19, , pm 7. I am now having this problem and it is annoying!!! It is happening almost 3 times in 5 minutes.
- In a World With the New Warriors Arena, No One Will Ever Lose Money Again!
- Sejanus (A Marcus Corvinus mystery Book 4).
- SIGN UP FOR EMAILS AND THEN POST A SELFIE NEXT TO YOUR EMAIL;
- Navigation menu.
- Slavery And The War: A Historical Essay (1863).
- 6 Verbal Practice Tests for the SSAT Upper.
- Bad Money.
JonthueM October 19, , pm 8. Gareth October 20, , am 9. ArondeParon October 24, , pm Sparkdust January 24, , pm No one needs that much YouTube. And yet, even as it knew its traffic volume was inherently fake , YouTube used those bot-enhanced numbers as its goal for what it ought to extract from its human user base.
It trained its algorithms to feed people the content that kept them engaged—that is, content that made ever-escalating demands on their attention. Paul Covington, a senior Google engineer who coauthored the recommendation engine research, presented the findings at a conference the following March. He was asked how the engineers decide what outcome to aim for with their algorithms.
These decisions were made—people made these decisions—not because the people running YouTube were cutting corners for the sake of survival, but because they wanted to make an already unimaginably powerful position of wealth and dominance even more wealthy and dominant.
YouTube was not trying to push out competing video-hosting platforms, but to claw away market share from life itself. In the 20th century, tobacco companies set the standard for what we think of as corporate malevolence: they intentionally made their products more addictive even as they fought to keep their customers ignorant of the fact that smoking would kill them.
But at least the tobacco industry was selling an inherently dangerous product in the first place, and its evils all flowed from that built-in necessity. YouTube set out to change its product into something more harmful, to make it more successful. And since that success was defined by uncontrolled growth, it became its own excuse.
This is the logic of the megaplatforms. They operate like drivers going 90 miles per hour through an unfamiliar residential neighborhood at dusk, with no headlights. How can they be expected not to hit anyone? This is also, unfortunately, how the tech companies building literal self-driving cars operate. Responsibility becomes vulnerability. Bloomberg described how YouTube made inaction into a formal course of action:. YouTube actively dissuaded staff from being proactive.
Lawyers verbally advised employees not assigned to handle moderation to avoid searching on their own for questionable videos, like viral lies about Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, according to one former executive upset by the practice.